4.6 Review

Viral Persistence and Chronicity in Hepatitis C Virus Infection: Role of T-Cell Apoptosis, Senescence and Exhaustion

期刊

CELLS
卷 7, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells7100165

关键词

apoptosis; viral persistence; hepatitis C virus; immunity; chronic infection

资金

  1. High Impact Research (HIR), University of Malaya [625/1/HIR/139]
  2. University Malaya Fellowship Scheme [FG019-17AFR]
  3. Swedish Research Council [AI52731]
  4. Swedish Physicians Against AIDS Research Foundation
  5. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency
  6. SIDA SARC
  7. VINNMER for Vinnova
  8. Linkoping University Hospital Research Fund
  9. CALF
  10. Swedish Society of Medicine (SvenskaLakaresallskapet)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) represents a challenging global health threat to similar to 200 million infected individuals. Clinical data suggest that only similar to 10-15% of acutely HCV-infected individuals will achieve spontaneous viral clearance despite exuberant virus-specific immune responses, which is largely attributed to difficulties in recognizing the pathognomonic symptoms during the initial stages of exposure to the virus. Given the paucity of a suitable small animal model, it is also equally challenging to study the early phases of viral establishment. Further, the host factors contributing to HCV chronicity in a vast majority of acutely HCV-infected individuals largely remain unexplored. The last few years have witnessed a surge in studies showing that HCV adopts myriad mechanisms to disconcert virus-specific immune responses in the host to establish persistence, which includes, but is not limited to viral escape mutations, viral growth at privileged sites, and antagonism. Here we discuss a few hitherto poorly explained mechanisms employed by HCV that are believed to lead to chronicity in infected individuals. A better understanding of these mechanisms would aid the design of improved therapeutic targets against viral establishment in susceptible individuals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据