4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

On Optical Dipole Moment and Radiative Recombination Lifetime of Excitons in WSe2

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 27, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201601741

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [EFMA-1542741]
  2. David and Lucile Packard fellowship
  3. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Optical dipole moment is the key parameter of optical transitions, as it directly determines the strength of light-matter interaction such as intrinsic radiative lifetime. However, experimental determination of these fundamental properties of excitons in monolayer WSe2 is largely limited, because the commonly used measurement, such as (time-resolved) photoluminescence, is inherently difficult to probe the intrinsic properties. For example, dark states below bright exciton can change the photoluminescence emission rate by orders of magnitude and gives an effective radiative lifetime distinctive from the intrinsic one. On the other hand, such effective radiative lifetime becomes important itself because it describes how dark states affect exciton dynamics. Unfortunately, the effective radiative lifetime in monolayer WSe2 is also not determined as it requires photoluminescence measurement with resonant excitation, which is technically difficult. These difficulties are overcome here to obtain both the intrinsic and effective radiative lifetime experimentally. A framework is developed to determine the dipole moment and intrinsic radiative lifetime of delocalized excitons in monolayer WSe2 from the absorption measurements. In addition, the effective radiative lifetime in WSe2 is obtained through time-resolved photoluminescence and absolute quantum-yield measurement at resonant excitation. These results provide helpful information for fundamental understanding of exciton light-matter interaction in WSe2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据