4.8 Article

Identifying quasi-2D and 1D electrides in yttrium and scandium chlorides via geometrical identification

期刊

NPJ COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41524-018-0136-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51201148, U1530402]
  2. Thousand Youth Talents Plan
  3. MEXT Element Strategy Initiative
  4. ACCEL of the Japan Science and Technology Agency in Japan
  5. MEXT KAKEHI [17H06153]
  6. JSPS fellowship for young scientists [18J00745]
  7. High Performance Computing Center of Yanshan University
  8. WRHI program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Developing and understanding electron-rich electrides offers a promising opportunity for a variety of electronic and catalytic applications. Using a geometrical identification strategy, here we identify a new class of electride material, yttrium/scandium chlorides Y(Sc)(x)Cl-y (y:x < 2). Anionic electrons are found in the metal octahedral framework topology. The diverse electronic dimensionality of these electrides is quantified explicitly by quasi-two-dimensional (2D) electrides for [YCl](+).e-and [ScCl](+).e(-) and one-dimensional (1D) electrides for [Y2Cl3](+).e(-), [Sc7Cl10](+).e(-), and [Sc5Cl8](2+). 2(e-) with divalent metal elements (Sc2+:3d(1) and Y2+:4d(1)). The localized anionic electrons were confined within the inner-layer spaces, rather than inter-layer spaces that are observed in A(2)B-type 2D electrides, e.g. Ca2N. Moreover, when hydrogen atoms are introduced into the host structures to form YClH and Y2Cl3H, the generated phases transform to conventional ionic compounds but exhibited a surprising reduction of work function, arising from the increased Fermi level energy, contrary to the conventional electrides reported so far. Y2Cl3 was experimentally confirmed to be a semiconductor with a band gap of 1.14 eV. These results may help to promote the rational design and discovery of new electride materials for further technological applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据