4.8 Article

Systematic Study of Widely Applicable N-Doping Strategy for High-Performance Solution-Processed Field-Effect Transistors

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 26, 期 43, 页码 7886-7894

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201602610

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIP) [NRF-2015R1A2A1A10054466]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015R1A2A1A10054466, 2016H1A2A1906533] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A specific design for solution-processed doping of active semiconducting materials would be a powerful strategy in order to improve device performance in flexible and/or printed electronics. Tetrabutylammonium fluoride and tetrabutylammonium hydroxide contain Lewis base anions, F- and OH-, respectively, which are considered as organic dopants for efficient and cost-effective n-doping processes both in n-type organic and nanocarbon-based semiconductors, such as poly[[N,N'-bis(2-octyldodecyl)-naphthalene-1,4,5,8-bis(dicarboximide)-2,6-diyl]-alt-5,5'-(2,2'-bithiophene)] (P(NDI2OD-T2)) and selectively dispersed semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes by p-conjugated polymers. The dramatic enhancement of electron transport properties in field-effect transistors is confirmed by the effective electron transfer from the dopants to the semiconductors as well as controllable onset and threshold voltages, convertible charge-transport polarity, and simultaneously showing excellent device stabilities under ambient air and bias stress conditions. This simple solution-processed chemical doping approach could facilitate the understanding of both intrinsic and extrinsic charge transport characteristics in organic semiconductors and nanocarbon-based materials, and is thus widely applicable for developing high-performance organic and printed electronics and optoelectronics devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据