4.7 Article

Air-Sea Gas Exchange and CO2 Fluxes in a Tropical Coral Reef Lagoon

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
卷 123, 期 12, 页码 8701-8713

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018JC014423

关键词

gas exchange; coral reefs; tracers; CO2

资金

  1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration - University of Hawaii Sea Grant College Program, SOEST from NOAA Office of Sea Grant, Department of Commerce [NA090AR4170060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coral reefs are found predominately in tropical and subtropical areas and are sites of active carbon cycling. Knowledge of gas transfer velocities is necessary for carbon cycle studies in coral reef environments, and past studies in these environments have used wind speed/gas exchange parameterizations intended for the open ocean. In order to determine the relationship between wind speed and gas exchange, and to assess the suitability of open ocean wind speed/gas exchange parameterizations for this environment, two He-3/SF6 tracer release experiments were conducted during two separate years in a tropical coral reef lagoon in Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii. The results show that because water depth is relatively deep in much of Kaneohe Bay, some parameterizations intended for the open ocean can be used to predict gas transfer velocities in that environment. The bay was a source of CO2 to the atmosphere during both studies, and the residence times of water in the bay during the two studies differed by a factor of two. Plain Language Summary In order to study carbon cycling in coral reef ecosystems, scientist need to know the rate at which gases move between the ocean and the atmosphere, called the gas transfer velocity. Geochemical tracers are used to investigate the relationship between wind speed and gas transfer velocity in Kaneohe Bay in Hawaii, a tropical coral reef lagoon. The study determined that relationships between wind speed and gas transfer velocity developed for the open ocean could be applied in coral reef ecosystems, if the water is sufficiently deep.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据