4.6 Review

Towards reliable Arctic sea ice prediction using multivariate data assimilation

期刊

SCIENCE BULLETIN
卷 64, 期 1, 页码 63-72

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2018.11.018

关键词

Arctic sea ice prediction; Remote sensing; Data assimilation

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0605901]
  2. NOAA Climate Program Office [NA15OAR4310163]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41676185]
  4. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDY-SSW-DQC021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rapid declines in Arctic sea ice have captured attention and pose significant challenges to a variety of stakeholders. There is a rising demand for Arctic sea ice prediction at daily to seasonal time scales, which is partly a sea ice initial condition problem. Thus, a multivariate data assimilation that integrates sea ice observations to generate realistic and skillful model initialization is needed to improve predictive skill of Arctic sea ice. Sea ice data assimilation is a relatively new research area. In this review paper, we focus on two challenges for implementing multivariate data assimilation systems for sea ice forecast. First, to address the challenge of limited spatiotemporal coverage and large uncertainties of observations, we discuss sea ice parameters derived from satellite remote sensing that (1) have been utilized for improved model initialization, including concentration, thickness and drift, and (2) are currently under development with the potential for enhancing the predictability of Arctic sea ice, including melt ponds and sea ice leads. Second, to strive to generate the best estimate of sea ice initial conditions by combining model simulations/forecasts and observations, we review capabilities and limitations of different data assimilation techniques that have been developed and used to assimilate observed sea ice parameters in dynamical models. (C) 2018 Science China Press. Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science China Press. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据