4.4 Article

Neoprotoparmelia gen. nov. and Maronina (Lecanorales, Protoparmelioideae): species description and generic delimitation using DNA barcodes and phenotypical characters

期刊

MYCOKEYS
卷 -, 期 44, 页码 19-50

出版社

PENSOFT PUBL
DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.44.29904

关键词

ITS; lichenised fungi; BPP; new genus; new species; Parmeliaceae; taxonomy

类别

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Spain [CGL2013-42498-P]
  2. MINECO, Spain [CGL2014-55542-P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multilocus phylogenetic studies revealed a high level of cryptic diversity within the lichen-forming fungal genus Maronina (Protoparmelioideae, Parmeliaceae). Coalescent-based species delimitation suggested that most of the cryptic molecular lineages warranted recognition as separate species. Here we study the morphology and chemistry of these taxa and formally describe eight new species based on phenotypical and molecular characters. Further, we evaluate the use of ITS rDNA as a DNA barcode for identifying species in this genus. For the first time, we obtained an ITS sequence of Maronina australiensis, the type species of the genus and showed that it is phylogenetically not closely related to species currently placed in Mara nina or Protoparmelia. We assembled a dataset of 66 ITS sequences to assess the interspecics genetic distances amongst the twelve Maronina species using ITS as DNA barcode. We found that Maronina and Protoparmelia form a supported monophyletic group whereas M. australiensis is sister to both. We herefore propose a new genus Neoprotoparmelia to accommodate the tropical-subtropical species within Protoparmelioideae, with Neoprotoparmelia cora:few as the type, N amerisidiata, N ausralisidiata, N brasilisidiata, N capensis, N. crassa, N. pauli, N. plurisporibadia and N siamisidiata as new species and N. capitata, N isidiata, N. multifera, N. orientalis and N. pulchra as new proposed combinations. We provide a key to Neoprotoparmelia and confirm the use of ITS for accurately identifying species in this group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据