4.5 Article

Graphene oxide enhanced adsorption capacity of chitosan/magnetite nanocomposite for Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solution

期刊

MATERIALS RESEARCH EXPRESS
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/aae55c

关键词

Fe3O4/graphene oxide/chitosan (FGCs) nanocomposite; Cr(VI) removal; recoverable and recyclable adsorbent; magnetite; heavy metal ions removal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, we propose a simple method for preparing of Fe3O4/graphene oxide/chitosan (FGCs) nanocomposite and its application for removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution by adsorption process. The advantages of this adsorbent that it can be recovered by an external magnet as well as it can be regenerated. For that, FGCs nanocomposite has been synthesized co-precipitation method and synthesized FGCs has been characterized by x-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-Transform Infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) and Energy Dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The sorption efficiency of FGCs was evaluated by adsorption Cr(VI) ions from aqueous solution to optimize contents in FGCs adsorbent material and also for adsorption process. The results shown that the adsorption of Cr(VI) on FGCs can be reached to maximal with the content of FGCs is 68 wt% of Fe3O4 nanoparticles, 2 wt% of graphene oxide (GO) and 30 wt% of chitosan (CS) (sample FGCs-68/2/30). The adsorption process was carried out at pH3 (pH = 3) with the contact time ca. 40 min and dosage of adsorbent around 0.04 mg.mL(-1) . The adsorption isotherm fits the Langmuir model with adsorption capacity of FGCs-68/2/30 for Cr(VI) is 200 mg.g(-1). In addition, the reusability of FGCs nanocomposite was tested and about 75% of removal efficiency was obtained after 6 cycles. Therefore, the FGCs nanocomposite has a good stability and may be a promising material for removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution to clean up the environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据