4.5 Review

Elimination of HIV transmission through novel and established prevention strategies among people who inject drugs

期刊

LANCET HIV
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 E128-E136

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30292-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse [DP2-DA040236]
  2. Canadian Institute of Health Research Canadian HIV Trials Network
  3. CTN Postdoctoral Fellowship Award
  4. United States National Institutes of Health [U01-DA021525]
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  6. Michael Smith Foundation of Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the effectiveness of existing HIV prevention strategies for people who inject drugs (PWID), uncontrolled outbreaks of HIV among this group are common and occur around the world. In this Review, we summarise recent evidence for novel and established HIV prevention approaches to eliminate HIV transmission among PWID. Effective HIV prevention strategies include mobile needle and syringe programmes, pre-exposure prophylaxis, supervised injection facilities, and, to a lesser extent, some behavioural interventions. Studies have also shown the cost-effectiveness of long-standing HIV prevention strategies including needle and syringe programmes, opioid agonist therapy, and antiretroviral therapy for prevention. Although each individual intervention can reduce the risk of HIV acquisition among PWID, there is a consensus that a combination of approaches is required to achieve substantial and durable reductions in HIV transmission. Unfortunately, in many settings, the implementation of these interventions is often limited by public and political opposition that manifests as structural barriers to HIV prevention, such as the criminalisation of drug use. Given that there is ample evidence showing the effectiveness of several HIV prevention methods, social and political advocacy will be needed to overcome these barriers and integrate innovative HIV prevention approaches with addiction science to create effective drug policies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据