4.3 Article

A multipurpose instrument for time-resolved ultra-small-angle and coherent X-ray scattering

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 1511-1524

出版社

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S1600576718012748

关键词

small-angle X-ray scattering; SAXS; ultra-small-angle X-ray scattering; USAXS; X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy; XPCS; time-resolved X-ray scattering

资金

  1. ESRF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents the main technical features and performance of the upgraded beamline ID02 at the ESRF. The beamline combines different small-angle X-ray scattering techniques in one unique instrument, enabling static and kinetic investigations from angstrom to micrometre size scales and time resolution down to the sub-millisecond range. The main component of the instrument is an evacuated detector tube of length 34m and diameter 2m. Several different detectors are housed inside a motorized wagon that travels along a rail system, allowing an automated change of the sample-detector distance from about 1 to 31m as well as selection of the desired detector. For optional combined wide-angle scattering measurements, a wide-angle detector is installed at the entrance cone of the tube. A scattering vector (of magnitude q) range of 0.002 q 50nm(-1) is covered with two sample-detector distances and a single-beam setting for an X-ray wavelength of 1 angstrom. In the high-resolution mode, two-dimensional ultra-small-angle X-ray scattering patterns down to q < 0.001nm(-1) can be recorded, and the resulting one-dimensional profiles have superior quality as compared to those measured with an optimized Bonse-Hart instrument. In the highest-resolution mode, the beam is nearly coherent, thereby permitting multispeckle ultra-small-angle X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy measurements. The main applications of the instrument include the elucidation of static and transient hierarchical structures, and nonequilibrium dynamics in soft matter and biophysical systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据