4.2 Article

VICA, a visual counseling agent for emotional distress

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12652-019-01180-x

关键词

Conversational agent; Visual counseling agent; Avatar; Voice conversation; Dialogue continuation; Self-awareness

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP15K00349, JP15K00382]
  2. Artificial Intelligence Research Promotion Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present VICA, a Visual Counseling Agent designed to create an engaging multimedia face-to-face interaction. VICA is a human-friendly agent equipped with high-performance voice conversation designed to help psychologically stressed users, to offload their emotional burden. Such users specifically include non-computer-savvy elderly persons or clients. Our agent builds replies exploiting interlocutor's utterances expressing such as wishes, obstacles, emotions, etc. Statements asking for confirmation, details, emotional summary, or relations among such expressions are added to the utterances. We claim that VICA is suitable for positive counseling scenarios where multimedia specifically high-performance voice communication is instrumental for even the old or digital divided users to continue dialogue towards their self-awareness. To prove this claim, VICA's effect is evaluated with respect to a previous text-based counseling agent CRECA and ELIZA including its successors. An experiment involving 14 subjects shows VICA effects as follows: (i) the dialogue continuation (CPS: Conversation-turns Per Session) of VICA for the older half (age>40) substantially improved 53% to CRECA and 71% to ELIZA. (ii) VICA's capability to foster peace of mind and other positive feelings was assessed with a very high score of 5 or 6 mostly, out of 7 stages of the Likert scale, again by the older. Compared on average, such capability of VICA for the older is 5.14 while CRECA (all subjects are young students, age<25) is 4.50, ELIZA is 3.50, and the best of ELIZA's successors for the older (>25) is 4.41.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据