4.8 Review

Tissue Resident CD8 Memory T Cell Responses in Cancer and Autoimmunity

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02810

关键词

T-RM; TIL; CD103; T-CM; melanoma; vitiligo; immunotherapy; biomarker

资金

  1. NIH [F31CA232554-01, R21CA209375-01, R01CA225028, R01CA214062, R01CA205965, P30CA023108-38]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resident memory (T-RM) cells are a distinct tissue-localized T cell lineage that is crucial for protective immunity in peripheral tissues. While a great deal of effort has focused on defining their role in immunity to infections, studies now reveal T-RM cells as a vital component of the host immune response to cancer. Characterized by cell-surface molecules including CD103, CD69, and CD49a, T-RM-like tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) can be found in a wide range of human cancers, where they portend improved prognosis. Recent studies in mouse tumor models have shown that T-RM cells are induced by cancer vaccines delivered in peripheral tissue sites, or by the depletion of regulatory T cells. Such tumor-specific T-RM cells are recognized as both necessary and sufficient for long-lived protection against tumors in peripheral tissue locations. T-RM responses against tumor/self-antigens can concurrently result in the development of pathogenic T-RM responses to self, with a growing number of autoimmune diseases and inflammatory pathologies being attributed to T-RM responses. This review will recount the path to discovering the importance of resident memory CD8 T cells as they pertain to cancer immunity. In addition to highlighting key studies that directly implicate T-RM cells in anti-tumor immunity, we will highlight earlier work that implicitly suggested their importance. Informed by studies in infectious disease models, and instructed by a clear role for T-RM cells in autoimmunity, we will discuss strategies for therapeutically promoting T-RM responses in settings where they don't naturally occur.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据