4.6 Article

Fatigue Performance and Model of Polyacrylonitrile Fiber Reinforced Asphalt Mixture

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 8, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app8101818

关键词

asphalt mixture; PAN fiber; fatigue performance; fatigue model; loading condition

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51478052]
  2. Hunan Transportation Department [201302]
  3. Guangdong Transportation Department [2013-01-002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fatigue is considered a major pavement structural distress and an important part of a performance-based mix design. Currently, the fatigue model of asphalt mixture, especially the mixture incorporated with fibers, is not perfect. In this paper, the central-point bending fatigue test was conducted by constant strain mode with MTS apparatus. The fatigue performance and model of polyacrylonitrile (PAN) fiber-reinforced asphalt mixture produced with different fiber contents and asphalt contents were reported. The results indicated that the fatigue life of fiber reinforced mixture was higher than the reference one. The effects of fiber contents and asphalt contents on fatigue life were discussed. The mechanism of an optimum fiber content for the fatigue life in the fiber reinforced asphalt mixture was explained. The statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) method and regression method were used to evaluate the effects of fiber content, strain level, and volumetric parameters, etc. on the fatigue life of an asphalt mixture. This paper presents a new fatigue performance model of a PAN fiber-reinforced asphalt mixture, including the fiber content, tensile strain, mixture initial flexural stiffness, and voids filled with asphalt (VFA). Compared to the earlier fatigue equations, the accuracy of the new fatigue model with the fiber content is improved significantly according to the statistical analysis results. Meanwhile, the model can preferably reveal the effect of fiber content, strain level, initial stiffness, and VFA on fatigue life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据