4.8 Review

Self-Assembled Nanostructured Lipid Systems: Is There a Link between Structure and Cytotoxicity?

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201801223

关键词

cell-nanoparticle interactions; drug delivery systems; liquid crystalline lipids; self-assembled nanostructures; tissue cytotoxicity

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology
  2. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship
  3. Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Self-assembly of lipid-based liquid crystalline (LLC) nanoparticles is a formulation art arising from the hydrophilic-lipophilic qualities and the geometric packing of amphiphilic lipid molecules in an aqueous environment. The diversity of commercialized amphiphilic lipids and an increased understanding of the physicochemical factors dictating their membrane curvature has enabled versatile architectural design and engineering of LLC nanoparticles. While these exotic nanostructured materials are hypothesized to form the next generation of smart therapeutics for a broad field of biomedical applications, biological knowledge particularly on the systemic biocompatibility or cytotoxicity of LLC materials remains unclear. Here, an overview on the interactions between LLCs of different internal nanostructures and biological components (including soluble plasma constituents, blood cells, and isolated tissue cell lines) is provided. Factors affecting cell-nanoparticle tolerability such as the type of lipids, type of steric stabilizers, nanoparticle surface charges, and internal nanostructures (or lipid phase behaviors) are elucidated. The mechanisms of cellular uptake and lipid transfer between neighboring membrane domains are also reviewed. A critical analysis of these studies sheds light on future strategies to transform LLC materials into a viable therapeutic entity ideal for internal applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据