4.8 Article

Mapping Polymer Molecular Order in the SEM with Secondary Electron Hyperspectral Imaging

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201801752

关键词

electron microscope; molecular order; organic electronics; polymer; secondary electron spectroscopy

资金

  1. Gauss Centre for Supercomputing
  2. European Commission under the Graphene Flagship Core 2 Grant [785219]
  3. FET Proactive (Neurofibres) Grant [732344]
  4. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR) under the Departments of Excellence'' Grant [L.232/2016]
  5. EPSRC [EP/M025020/1, EP/N008065/1, 1816190] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding nanoscale molecular order within organic electronic materials is a crucial factor in building better organic electronic devices. At present, techniques capable of imaging molecular order within a polymer are limited in resolution, accuracy, and accessibility. In this work, presented are secondary electron (SE) spectroscopy and secondary electron hyperspectral imaging, which make an exciting alternative approach to probing molecular ordering in poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) with scanning electron microscope-enabled resolution. It is demonstrated that the crystalline content of a P3HT film is reflected by its SE energy spectrum, both empirically and through correlation with nano-Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, an innovative technique for exploring nanoscale chemistry. The origin of SE spectral features is investigated using both experimental and modeling approaches, and it is found that the different electronic properties of amorphous and crystalline P3HT result in SE emission with different energy distributions. This effect is exploited by acquiring hyperspectral SE images of different P3HT films to explore localized molecular orientation. Machine learning techniques are used to accurately identify and map the crystalline content of the film, demonstrating the power of an exciting characterization technique.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据