4.6 Article

Relationship between vertical and horizontal force-velocity-power profiles in various sports and levels of practice

期刊

PEERJ
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5937

关键词

Jumping; Sprinting; Testing; Force-velocity profile; Strength training

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport [CAS15/00171]
  2. National Program for Mobility stays abroad 'Jose Castillejo' for young doctors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed (i) to explore the relationship between vertical (jumping) and horizontal (sprinting) force-velocity-power (FVP) mechanical profiles in a large range of sports and levels of practice, and (ii) to provide a large database to serve as a reference of the FVP profile for all sports and levels tested. A total of 553 participants (333 men, 220 women) from 14 sport disciplines and all levels of practice participated in this study. Participants performed squat jumps (SJ) against multiple external loads (vertical) and linear 30-40 m sprints (horizontal). The vertical and horizontal FVP profile (i.e., theoretical maximal values of force (F-0), velocity (v(0)), and power (P-max)) as well as main performance variables (unloaded SJ height in jumping and 20-m sprint time) were measured. Correlations coefficient between the same mechanical variables obtained from the vertical and horizontal modalities ranged from -0.12 to 0.58 for F-0, -0.31 to 0.71 for v(0), -0.10 to 0.67 for P-max, and -0.92 to -0.23 for the performance variables (i.e, SJ height and sprint time). Overall, results showed a decrease in the magnitude of the correlations for higher-level athletes. The low correlations generally observed between jumping and sprinting mechanical outputs suggest that both tasks provide distinctive information regarding the FVP profile of lower-body muscles. Therefore, we recommend the assessment of the FVP profile both in jumping and sprinting to gain a deeper insight into the maximal mechanical capacities of lower-body muscles, especially at high and elite levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据