4.6 Article

Nutritional value of several commercially important river fish species from the Czech Republic

期刊

PEERJ
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5729

关键词

Eicosapentenoic acid; Docosahexaenoic acid; Nutritional value; Index of atherogenicity; Index of thrombogenicity

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic - project CENAKVA [CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0024]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic - project CENAKVA Center Development [CZ.1.05/2.1.00/19.0380]
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic - project CENAKVA II (NPU I program) [LO1205]
  4. Grant Agency of the University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice [GAJU060/2016/Z]
  5. NAZV project [QJ1510119, QK1810296]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proximate and fatty acid (FA) composition of seven freshwater fish species from the Czech Republic were examined. Moreover, the index of atherogenicity (IA) and the index of thrombogenicity (IT) were calculated from the obtained data. These two indices along with the total content of the essential n-3 FAs, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) as well as the ratio of n-6/n3 FAs, provide good indicators for the nutritional value of the fish. The species had been selected owing to the limited amount of information about their nutritional composition available. Furthermore, they are not typically subject to aquaculture, being almost exclusively obtained by angling. The protein content was relatively stable in all species (17.1 +/- 1.55 to 19.2 +/- 2.20 g/100 g). The content of carbohydrates ranged from 0.02 +/- 0.1 to 0.99 +/- 0.0 g/100 g and ash from 1.08 +/- 0.20 to 2.54 +/- 1.57 g/100 g. As expected, a high variability was observed in the fat content (0.74 +/- 0.04 to 4.04 +/- 0.81 g/100 g) and the FA composition, as well as the contents of EPA and DHA. IA and IT were close to the values stated for the Eskimo diet, indicating a high nutritional value with a positive effect for human health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据