4.6 Article

Osteology of a forelimb of an aetosaur Stagonolepis olenkae ( Archosauria: Pseudosuchia: Aetosauria) from the Krasiejow locality in Poland and its probable adaptations for a scratch-digging behavior

期刊

PEERJ
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5595

关键词

Aetosauria; Manus; Archosauria; Scratch-digging; Forelimb; Carpus; Krasiejow

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aetosaurs are armored basal archosaurs that played a significant role in land ecosystems during the Late Triassic (237-201 Ma). The polish species Stagonolepis olenkae Sulej, 2010 described from the Krasiejow locality (southern Poland) is one of the oldest known representatives of the group. Abundant and well-preserved material, including partially articulated specimens, allows a detailed description of the forelimbs in this species. The forelimbs of S. olenkae are the most similar to that of large aetosaurs like Desmatosuchus smalli, Desmatosuchus spurensis, Longosuchus meadei, Typothorax coccinarum or Stagonolepis robertsoni. Several characters recognized in the forelimbs of S. olenkae suggest its adaptation for scratch-digging. The most salient of these features are: short forearm, carpus, and hands, with the radius shorter than the humerus, carpus and manus shorter than the radius (excluding terminal phalanges); a prominent deltopectoral crest that extends distally on the humerus and a wide prominent entepicondyle, a long olecranon process with well-marked attachment of triceps muscle; hooked, laterally compressed, claw-like terminal phalanges with ornamentation of small pits (indicative of well-developed keratin sheaths). S. olenkae might have used its robust forelimbs to break through the compacted soil with its claws and proceed to dig in search of food in softened substrate with the shovel-like expansion at the tip of its snout. The entire forelimb of S. olenkae is covered by osteoderms, including the dorsal surface of the hand, which is unusual among aetosaurs and have not been noted for any species up to date.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据