4.6 Article

Promotion of tumor progression and cancer stemness by MUC15 in thyroid cancer via the GPCR/ERK and integrin-FAK signaling pathways

期刊

ONCOGENESIS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41389-018-0094-y

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and ICT and Business Belt Program [2017K000492]
  2. Yonsei University College of Medicine [6-2013-0108]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [2017R1A2B4010480]
  4. Research fellowship program of National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [NRF-2017R1A6A3A11032244]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A2B4010480] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thyroid cancer is the fifth most common cancer diagnosed in women worldwide. Notwithstanding advancements in the prognosis and treatment of thyroid cancer, 10-20% of thyroid cancer patients develops chemotherapeutic resistance and experience relapse. According to previous reports and TCGA database, MUCTS (MUCIN 15) upregulation is highly correlated with thyroid cancer progression. However, the role of MUCKS in tumor progression and metastasis is unclear. This study aimed to investigate factors mediating cancer stemness in thyroid cancer. MUCKS plays an important role in sphere formation, as an evident from the expression of stemness markers including SOX2, KLF4, ALDH1A3, and IL6. Furthermore, ectopic expression of MUCKS activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling via G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)/cyclic AMP (cAMP) and integrin/focal adhesion kinase pathways. Interestingly, ectopic expression of MUC15 did not affect RAF/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)-mediated ERK activation. The present findings may provide novel insights into the development of diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic applications of MUC15 in thyroid cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据