4.5 Article

In Situ Formation of a Metastable β-Ti Alloy by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) of Vanadium and Iron Modified Ti-6Al-4V

期刊

METALS
卷 8, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met8121067

关键词

laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF); additive manufacturing; titanium alloys; microstructure; compression test

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG), Germany [Collaborative Research Center 814: Additive Manufacturing, Subproject B5]
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG), Germany [Erlangen Graduate School in Advanced Optical Technologies (SAOT)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this work is to investigate the beta-Ti-phase-stabilizing effect of vanadium and iron added to Ti-6Al-4V powder by means of heterogeneous powder mixtures and in situ alloy-formation during laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF). The resulting microstructure was analyzed by metallographic methods, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). The mechanical properties were characterized by compression tests, both prior to and after heat-treating. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy showed a homogeneous element distribution, proving the feasibility of in situ alloying by LPBF. Due to the beta-phase-stabilizing effect of V and Fe added to Ti-6Al-4V, instead of an alpha'-martensitic microstructure, an alpha/beta-microstructure containing at least 63.8% beta-phase develops. Depending on the post L-PBF heat-treatment, either an increased upsetting at failure (33.9%) compared to unmodified Ti-6Al-4V (28.8%), or an exceptional high compressive yield strength (1857 +/- 35 MPa compared to 1100 MPa) were measured. The hardness of the in situ alloyed material ranges from 336 +/- 7 HV0.5, in as-built condition, to 543 +/- 13 HV0.5 after precipitation-hardening. Hence, the range of achievable mechanical properties in dependence of the post-L-PBF heat-treatment can be significantly expanded in comparison to unmodified Ti-6Al-4V, thus providing increased flexibility for additive manufacturing of titanium parts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据