4.7 Article

PBF509, an Adenosine A2A Receptor Antagonist With Efficacy in Rodent Models of Movement Disorders

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01200

关键词

PBF509; Parkinson's disease; adenosine A(2A) receptor; catalepsy; label-free; tremor; hemiparkinsonism; antagonist

资金

  1. MINECO-AEI/FEDER, UE [SAF2017-87349-R]
  2. Catalan government [2017 SGR 1604]
  3. Fundacio la Marato de TV3 [20152031]
  4. FWO [SBO-140028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)R) antagonists have emerged as complementary non-dopaminergic drugs to alleviate Parkinson's disease (PD) symptomatology. Here, we characterize a novel non-xhantine non-furan A(2A)R antagonist, PBF509, as a potential pro-dopaminergic drug for PD management. First, PBF509 was shown to be a highly potent ligand at the human A(2A)R, since it antagonized A(2A)R agonist-mediated cAMP accumulation and impedance responses with K-B values of 72.8 +/- 17.4 and 8.2 +/- 4.2 nM, respectively. Notably, these results validated our new A(2A)R-based label-free assay as a robust and sensitive approach to characterize A(2A)R ligands. Next, we evaluated the efficacy of PBF509 reversing motor impairments in several rat models of movement disorders, including catalepsy, tremor, and hemiparkinsonism. Thus, PBF509 (orally) antagonized haloperidol-mediated catalepsy, reduced pilocarpine-induced tremulous jaw movements and potentiated the number of contralateral rotations induced by L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) in unilaterally 6-OHDA-lesioned rats. Moreover, PBF509 (3 mg/kg) inhibited L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia (LID), showing not only its efficacy on reversing parkinsonian motor impairments but also acting as antidyskinetic agent. Overall, here we describe a new orally selective A(2A)R antagonist with potential utility for PD treatment, and for some of the side effects associated to the current pharmacotherapy (i.e., dyskinesia).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据