4.5 Review

Challenges and Future Perspectives on Electroencephalogram-Based Biometrics in Person Recognition

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROINFORMATICS
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2018.00066

关键词

electroencephalography (EEG); biometrics; person recognition; person authentication; person identification

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST-105-2811-B-010-005, MOST-105-2811-B-010-034, MOST-105-2221-E-009-057, MOST-106-2221-E-009-164-MY2, MOST-107-2218-E-369-001, MOST-107-3017-F009-003]
  2. Ministry of Education, Taiwan (SPROUT Project-Center for Emergent Functional Matter Science of National Chiao Tung University)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The emergence of the digital world has greatly increased the number of accounts and passwords that users must remember. It has also increased the need for secure access to personal information in the cloud. Biometrics is one approach to person recognition, which can be used in identification as well as authentication. Among the various modalities that have been developed, electroencephalography (EEG)-based biometrics features unparalleled universality, distinctiveness and collectability, while minimizing the risk of circumvention. However, commercializing EEG-based person recognition poses a number of challenges. This article reviews the various systems proposed over the past few years with a focus on the shortcomings that have prevented wide-scale implementation, including issues pertaining to temporal stability, psychological and physiological changes, protocol design, equipment and performance evaluation. We also examine several directions for the further development of usable EEG-based recognition systems as well as the niche markets to which they could be applied. It is expected that rapid advancements in EEG instrumentation, on-device processing and machine learning techniques will lead to the emergence of commercialized person recognition systems in the near future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据