4.5 Review

Code Generation in Computational Neuroscience: A Review of Tools and Techniques

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROINFORMATICS
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2018.00068

关键词

code generation; simulation; neuronal networks; domain specific language; modeling language

资金

  1. Excellence Initiative of the German federal and state governments
  2. Julich Aachen Research Alliance High-Performance Computing, the Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association
  3. Hemholtz Portfolio Theme Simulation and Modeling for the Human Brain
  4. European Union [720270, 785907]
  5. EPSRC [EP/J019690/1, EP/P006094/1, EP/N018869/1]
  6. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-14-CE13-0003]
  7. BBSRC [BB/M025527/1]
  8. Open Science Prize
  9. NIH [R01NS11613]
  10. ETH Board Funding to the Blue Brain Project
  11. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01GQ1504B]
  12. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2017/04748-0]
  13. Wellcome Trust [086699/101445]
  14. BBSRC [BB/M025527/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  15. EPSRC [EP/J019690/1, EP/N018869/1, EP/P006094/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advances in experimental techniques and computational power allowing researchers to gather anatomical and electrophysiological data at unprecedented levels of detail have fostered the development of increasingly complex models in computational neuroscience. Large-scale, biophysically detailed cell models pose a particular set of computational challenges, and this has led to the development of a number of domain-specific simulators. At the other level of detail, the ever growing variety of point neuron models increases the implementation barrier even for those based on the relatively simple integrate-and-fire neuron model. Independently of the model complexity, all modeling methods crucially depend on an efficient and accurate transformation of mathematical model descriptions into efficiently executable code. Neuroscientists usually publish model descriptions in terms of the mathematical equations underlying them. However, actually simulating them requires they be translated into code. This can cause problems because errors may be introduced if this process is carried out by hand, and code written by neuroscientists may not be very computationally efficient. Furthermore, the translated code might be generated for different hardware platforms, operating system variants or even written in different languages and thus cannot easily be combined or even compared. Two main approaches to addressing this issues have been followed. The first is to limit users to a fixed set of optimized models, which limits flexibility. The second is to allow model definitions in a high level interpreted language, although this may limit performance. Recently, a third approach has become increasingly popular: using code generation to automatically translate high level descriptions into efficient low level code to combine the best of previous approaches. This approach also greatly enriches efforts to standardize simulator-independent model description languages. In the past few years, a number of code generation pipelines have been developed in the computational neuroscience community, which differ considerably in aim, scope and functionality. This article provides an overview of existing pipelines currently used within the community and contrasts their capabilities and the technologies and concepts behind them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据