4.5 Article

Separator Membranes for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: Design Principles, Structure, and Performance

期刊

ENERGY TECHNOLOGY
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ente.201800819

关键词

lithium-sulfur batteries; polysulfides; rechargeable batteries; separators; shuttle effect

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, India, under TAPSUN [NWP0056-D]
  2. CSIR, New Delhi (Bhatnagar Fellowship)
  3. Indian National Science Academy, New Delhi
  4. KVPY program, IISc, Bangalore, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Improvement in electrical energy storage systems is one of the most recent research topics of great academic and industrial interest. Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) battery systems offer a theoretical energy density an order of magnitude larger than the popular Li-ion batteries. The principle of working, inherent challenges in utilizing this system for commercial applications, and the various approaches taken to address these challenges are herein discussed in detail. The polysulfide shuttle effect is a major concern that deteriorates electrochemical performance in this system. In the recent past, electrodes have been intricately engineered to tackle this problem. However, more recently, the focus has shifted to the critical role of the separator. Modifying conventional separators or fabricating novel structures to enhance the cell performance appears to be a more feasible option. Some design principles that are critical to the functioning of a separator in Li-S batteries, namely physisorption, chemisorption, and electrostatic repulsion, are discussed. Many recent papers proposed novel cell configurations with specifically designed functional separators. These reports are classified according to three design principles, analyzed critically, and compared with a view to assess their relative merits and efficacy. Some thoughts on the future directions in the development of an efficient separator are described.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据