4.5 Article

Substrate Preference Pattern of Agaricus meleagris Pyranose Dehydrogenase Evaluated through Bioelectrochemical Flow Injection Amperometry

期刊

CHEMELECTROCHEM
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 801-809

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/celc.201801194

关键词

amperometry; enzyme modified electrode; osmium redox polymer; pyranose dehydrogenase; sugar oxidation

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsradet project) [2014-5908]
  2. European Commission (project Bioenergy) [FP7-PEOPLE-2013-ITN-607793]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pyranose dehydrogenase (PDH) is a quinone-dependent extracellular flavoglycoprotein mainly produced by litter-decomposing fungi and contributes to the degradation of lignocellulose. PDH in terms of structure and catalytic features pertains to the glucose methanol-choline oxidoreductase family and oxidizes a wide substrate range of aldopyranoses including hexoses, pentoses, disaccharides and oligosaccharides with a high degree of regioselectivity. The purpose of this study was to rationalize the preference of PDH immobilized on an electrode with the structural features of various substrates and thus the kinetic constants were measured for various sugars. PDH was co-immobilized on the electrode with an osmium redox polymer. Response currents for different sugars were measured using flow injection amperometry at +0.3 V vs. Ag vertical bar AgCl, KCl (0.1 M). The Michaelis-Menten constants, the turnover numbers and the catalytic efficiency were calculated and revealed that type, orientation and configuration of the substituent play a major role on substrate preference. An OH-group at C-1 and C-6 are not essential and substrate specificities are little affected by the substitution at C-1. The presence and orientation of OH- at C-2 and C-3 are relevant for reactivity. Orientation of OH- at the C-4 position has little effect, and sugars with a substitution below the plane at C-5 are not suitable as substrate. Highest activity for oxidation of glucose, mannose and sucrose was detected at pH 8.5.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据