4.5 Article

Tuning the NiO Thin Film Morphology on Carbon Nanotubes by Atomic Layer Deposition for Enzyme-Free Glucose Sensing

期刊

CHEMELECTROCHEM
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 383-392

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/celc.201801420

关键词

atomic layer deposition; electrochemistry; nickel oxide; non-enzymatic glucose sensor; stacked-cup carbon nanotubes

资金

  1. University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
  2. Yousef Jameel Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanocomposites made of stacked-cup carbon nanotubes coated with NiO (NiO/SCCNTs) via atomic layer deposition (ALD) were synthesized in order to obtain a material exhibiting enhanced and optimized electrochemical performance towards detections of glucose. The structure and morphology were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). NiO deposited as nanocrystalline particles in the cubic modification, were well dispersed and directly anchored on SCCNTs forming a smooth particulate thin film, which becomes more dense with the increase of the number of ALD cycles. The NiO/SCCNTs samples with various thicknesses of the NiO coating (0.8 nm, 1.7 nm, 4.0 nm, 6.5 nm, 14.0 nm and 21.8 nm) were applied for enzyme-free glucose sensing. Their electrochemical performance strongly depends on the thickness of the deposited NiO thin film. The best performing glucose sensors respond over a wide concentration range from 2 mu M to 2.2 mM (R-2=0.9979) with remarkably enhanced sensitivity (1252.3 mu A cm(-2) mM(-1)), with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.10 mu M (S/N=3) and with a fast response time (lower than 2 s). The significant performance improvement can be attributed to the conformal NiO coating, high surface to volume ratio and to the optimized thickness of the NiO thin film. The advantage of our sensors is also associated with the conductive supporting material (SCCNTs), simplicity of fabrication, high sensitivity, selectivity, stability and reproducibility for the rapid quantification of glucose.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据