4.6 Article

DSCAM-AS1 regulates the G1/S cell cycle transition and is an independent prognostic factor of poor survival in luminal breast cancer patients treated with endocrine therapy

期刊

CANCER MEDICINE
卷 7, 期 12, 页码 6137-6146

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1603

关键词

DSCAM-AS1; endocrine therapy; long noncoding RNA; luminal breast cancer; prognostic factor

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81572583, 81502278, 81372848, 81370075, 81302301]
  2. Municipal Project for Developing Emerging and Frontier Technology in Shanghai Hospitals [SHDC12010116]
  3. Cooperation Project of Conquering Major Diseases in Shanghai Municipality Health System [2013ZYJB0302]
  4. Innovation Team of Ministry of Education [IRT1223]
  5. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer [12DZ2260100]
  6. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20130071110057]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DSCAM-AS1 is one of the few intensively studied lncRNAs with high specific expression in luminal breast cancer. It is directly regulated by estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha) and plays vital roles in tumor proliferation, invasion, and tamoxifen resistance. However, the detailed function of DSCAM-AS1 in tumor progression and its clinical significance remain unclear. We reveal that DSCAM-AS1 regulates cell proliferation and colony formation by inducing the G1/S transition. RNA-seq analysis demonstrated that DSCAM-AS1 participates in crucial biological processes, including DNA replication, the G1/S phase transition, sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome segregation, protein localization to the chromosome and DNA recombination. Most importantly, in the retrospectively registered clinical analysis, high expression of DSCAM-AS1 is a poor prognostic factor in patients with luminal breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy. In conclusion, DSCAM-AS1 is a promising clinical therapeutic target that may prolong survival of luminal breast cancer patients treated with endocrine therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据