4.6 Article

Quantifying Figures of Merit for Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Applications: A Materials Survey

期刊

ACS PHOTONICS
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 240-259

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b01369

关键词

plasmonics; Mie theory; material characterization; hot electron devices; photothermal applications

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Reactive Plasmonics Programme [EP/M013812/1]
  2. Lee-Lucas Chair in Physics
  3. Henry Royce Institute made through EPSRC [EP/R00661X/1]
  4. EPSRC [EP/M013812/1, EP/P02520X/1, EP/M020398/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using localized surface plasmon resonances (LSPR) to focus electromagnetic radiation to the nanoscale shows the promise of unprecedented capabilities in optoelectronic devices, medical treatments and nanoscale chemistry, due to a strong enhancement of light-matter interactions. As we continue to explore novel applications, we require a systematic quantitative method to compare suitability across different geometries and a growing library of materials. In this work, we propose application-specific figures of merit constructed from fundamental electronic and optical properties of each material. We compare 17 materials from four material classes (noble metals, refractory metals, transition metal nitrides, and conductive oxides) considering eight topical LSPR applications. Our figures of merit go beyond purely electromagnetic effects and account for the materials' thermal properties, interactions with adjacent materials, and realistic illumination conditions. For each application we compare, for simplicity, an optimized spherical antenna geometry and benchmark our proposed choice against the state-of-the-art from the literature. Our propositions suggest the most suitable plasmonic materials for key technology applications and can act as a starting point for those working directly on the design, fabrication, and testing of such devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据