4.3 Article

Structural and nanomechanical comparison of epitaxially and solution-grown amyloid β25-35 fibrils

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2015.01.003

关键词

Amyloid; Atomic force microscopy; Force spectroscopy; Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; beta-Sheet structure; Structural compaction

资金

  1. Hungarian Science [OTKA K84133, OTKA K109480]
  2. European Union [HEALTH-F2-2011-278850 (INMiND)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A beta 25-35, the fibril-forming, biologically active toxic fragment of the full-length amyloidi beta-peptide also forms fibrils on mica by an epitaxial assembly mechanism. Here we investigated, by using atomic force microscopy, nanomechanical manipulation and FTIR spectroscopy, whether the epitaxially grown fibrils display structural and mechanical features similar to the ones evolving under equilibrium conditions in bulk solution. Unlike epitaxially grown fibrils, solution-grown fibrils displayed a heterogeneous morphology and an apparently helical structure. While fibril assembly in solution occurred on a time scale of hours, it appeared within a few minutes on mica surface fibrils. Both types of fibrils showed a similar plateau-like nanomechanical response characterized by the appearance of force staircases. The IR spectra of both fibril types contained an intense peak between 1620 and 1640 cm(-1), indicating that beta-sheets dominate their structure. A shift in the amide I band towards greater wave numbers in epitaxially assembled fibrils suggests that their structure is less compact than that of solution-grown fibrils. Thus, equilibrium conditions are required for a full structural compaction. Epitaxial A beta 25-35 fibril assembly, while significantly accelerated, may trap the fibrils in less compact configurations. Considering that under in vivo conditions the assembly of amyloid fibrils is influenced by the presence of extracellular matrix components, the ultimate fibril structure is likely to be influenced by the features of underlying matrix elements. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据