4.6 Article

Muscle force loss and soreness subsequent to maximal eccentric contractions depend on the amount of fascicle strain in vivo

期刊

ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA
卷 217, 期 2, 页码 152-163

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apha.12654

关键词

fascicle lengthening; muscle damage; shear wave elastography; ultrasonography

资金

  1. French Ministry of Sports [07-006]
  2. Region Pays de la Loire (ANOPACy) [2012-13467]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Defining the origins of muscle injury has important rehabilitation and exercise applications. However, current knowledge of muscle damage mechanics in human remains unclear in vivo. This study aimed to determine the relationships between muscle-tendon unit mechanics during maximal eccentric contractions and the extent of subsequent functional impairments induced by muscle damage. Methods: The length of the muscle-tendon unit, fascicles and tendinous tissues was continuously measured on the gastrocnemius medialis using ultrasonography, in time with torque, during 10 sets of 30 maximal eccentric contractions of plantar flexors at 45 degrees s(-1), in seventeen participants. Results: Muscle-tendon unit, fascicles and tendinous tissues were stretched up to 4.44 +/- 0.33 cm, 2.31 +/- 0.64 cm and 1.92 +/- 0.61 cm respectively. Fascicle stretch length, lengthening amplitude and negative fascicle work beyond slack length were significantly correlated with the force decrease 48 h post-exercise (r = 0.51, 0.47 and 0.68, respectively; P < 0.05). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the strain applied to human muscle fibres during eccentric contractions strongly influences the magnitude of muscle damage in vivo. Achilles tendon compliance decreases the amount of strain, while architectural gear ratio may moderately contribute to attenuating muscle fascicle lengthening and hence muscle damage. Further studies are necessary to explore the impact of various types of task to fully understand the contribution of muscle-tendon interactions during active lengthening to muscle damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据