4.6 Review

Tunable Emissions of Upconversion Fluorescence for Security Applications

期刊

ADVANCED OPTICAL MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adom.201801171

关键词

anti-counterfeiting; fabrication technologies; fluorescent ink formulation; security applications; singl; multimodel emission; upconversion crystals

资金

  1. NSFC [51471121]
  2. Basic Research Plan Program of Shenzhen City [JCYJ20160517104459444, JCYJ20170303170426117]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20160383]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2042018kf203]
  5. Wuhan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rampant appearance of counterfeiting has a serious adverse effect on every aspect in the global markets. Thus, the development of high-tech security strategies has become an urgent challenge. Recently, lanthanide ions (Ln(3+)) doped materials open new avenues for concealing factual data and shield against counterfeiting because of their unique optical characteristics of color-tunable emissions under near-infrared excitation. The present review surveys the recent advances in Ln(3+)-doped upconversion crystals (UCCs) as fluorescent functional inks toward designable and high-level anti-counterfeiting patterns and graphical encoding. The great achievements of fabrication of versatile security patterns can be ascribed to the combination of the single or multiple colorful UCCs with polymers, additives, and solvents. Moreover, the crucial factors including underlying mechanisms, synthetic methods of upconversion fluorescence materials, and the diverse printing technologies employed for patterning the fluorescence images have been highlighted, and the corresponding challenges and opportunities in this promising research area are presented. This review will help providing a fundamental understanding and guidance to rational design fluorescence optical labels based on Ln(3+)-doped UCCs for broadening their applications in high-level security fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据