4.6 Article

Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste Recovery by Conversion into Added-Value Polyhydroxyalkanoates and Biogas

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 12, 页码 16375-16385

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03454

关键词

Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA); Mixed microbial culture (MMC); Organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW); Volatile fatty acid (VFA); Anaerobic digestion; Renewable feedstock

资金

  1. Italian National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work (Istituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro, INAIL)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The integrated-multistage process proposed herein is a practical example of a biorefinery platform in which the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) is used as a valued source for polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) and biogas production. Technical and economical feasibilities of this approach have been demonstrated at pilot-scale, providing a possible upgrade to traditional biowaste management practices, presently based on anaerobic digestion (AD). A pH-controlled OFMSW fermentation stage produced a liquid VFArich stream with a high VFA/CODSOL ratio (0.90 COD/COD) that was easily used in the following aerobic stages for biomass and PHA production. The solid fraction was valorized into biogas through AD, obtaining energy and minimizing secondary flux waste generation. The reliable biomass enrichment was demonstrated by a stable feast-famine regime and supported by microbial community analysis. The selected consortium accumulated PHA up to 55% wt. Compared to the traditional AD process in an urban scenario of 900000 AE, the integrated approach for OFMSW valorization is preferable, and it is characterized by an electrical energy production of 85.7 MWh/d and 1.976 t/d as PHA productivity. The proposed process was also evaluated as economically sustainable if the PHA is marketed from 0.90 (sic)/kg as the minimum threshold to a higher market price.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据