4.3 Article

A novel modular fetal ECG STAN and HRV analysis: Towards robust hypoxia detection

期刊

TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 257-287

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/THC-181375

关键词

Fetal ECG (fECG); maternal ECG (mECG); abdominal ECG (aECG); feature extraction; STAN analysis (T:QRS ratio); fetal Heart Rate (fHR); fetal Heart Rate Variability (HRV)

资金

  1. Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic [SP2018/170]
  2. European Regional Development Fund in the Research Centre of Advanced Mechatronic Systems Project within the Operational Programme Research, Development and Education [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000867]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a comprehensive fetal Electrocardiogram (fECG) Signal Extraction and Analysis Virtual Instrument that integrates various methods for detecting the R-R Intervals (RRIs) as a means to determine the fetal Heart Rate (fHR) and therefore facilitates fetal Heart Rate Variability (HRV) signal analysis. Moreover, it offers the capability to perform advanced morphological fECG signal analysis called ST segment Analysis (STAN) as it seamlessly allows the determination of the T-wave to QRS complex ratio (also called T/QRS) in the fECG signal. The integration of these signal processing and analytical modules could help clinical researchers and practitioners to noninvasively monitor and detect the life threatening hypoxic conditions that may arise in different stages of pregnancy and more importantly during delivery and could therefore lead to the reduction of unnecessary C-sections. In our experiments we used real recordings from a Fetal Scalp Electrode (ESE) as well as maternal abdominal electrodes. This Virtual Instrument (Toolbox) not only serves as a desirable platform for comparing various fECG extraction signal processing methods, it also provides an effective means to perform STAN and HRV signal analysis based on proven ECG morphological as well as Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) indices to detect hypoxic conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据