4.2 Article

Associated factors that influenced persistence with basal analog insulin therapy among people with type 2 diabetes: An exploratory analysis from a UK real-world sample

期刊

PRIMARY CARE DIABETES
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 106-112

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2018.09.002

关键词

Type 2 diabetes; Insulin persistence; Insulin initiation; UK patients; Basal insulin

资金

  1. Eli Lilly and Company
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Real-world effectiveness of insulin therapy is affected by poor treatment persistence, often occurring soon after initiation. An international cross-sectional survey of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been conducted to describe reasons for non-persistence with insulin therapy. Methods: Responders to an online survey in 7 countries were classified as continuers (no gap of >= 7 days), interrupters (interrupted therapy for >= 7 days within first 6 months, then restarted), and discontinuers (terminated therapy for >= 7 days within first 6 months, no restart before survey). We present the results from the United Kingdom (UK) cohort. Results; Of 942 global respondents, 131 were from the UK, having a mean age of 37 years and a mean of 7 years since first T2DM diagnosis. Reasons contributing to insulin continuation (n = 50) were improved physical feeling (52.0%) and improved glycemic control (48.0%). Common reasons for interruption (n = 50) or discontinuation (n = 31), respectively were weight gain (50.0%, 48.4%) and hypoglycemia (38.0%, 25.8%). Most important reason for possible re-initiation for interrupters and discontinuers, respectively was persuasion by physician/healthcare professional (74.0%, 64.5%). Conclusion: The benefits of basal insulin therapy motivated continuers to persist with the treatment; experienced or anticipated side effects contributed to interruption and discontinuation. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Primary Care Diabetes Europe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据