4.7 Article

Computational Analysis of Nonuniform Expansion in Polyurethane Foams

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym11010100

关键词

polyurethane foams; nonuniform expansion; foam fraction distribution; reaction injection molding; chemorheology; finite-volume method

资金

  1. Fraunhofer High Performance Center for Simulation- and Software-Based Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper computationally investigates heterogeneity in the distribution of foam fraction in chemically expanding blown polyurethane foam. The experimentally observed disparity in the volumes of expanded foam when an equal mass of the foaming mixture was injected into tubes of different dimensions motivated this study. To understand this phenomenon, attributed to local variations in the thermal and rheological properties of the expanding system, we explore available data from free-rise foam-expansion experiments in different geometries. Inspired by the mathematical framework for the microstructure modelling of bubble growth in viscous liquids, we study the reacting mixture as a continuum and formulate appropriate mathematical models that account for spatial inhomogeneity in the foam-expansion process. The nonlinear coupled system of partial differential equations governing flow was numerically solved using finite-volume techniques, and the associated results are presented and discussed with graphical illustrations. The proximity of the foaming-mixture core to the external environment and the thickness of a thermal-diffusion layer formed near the bounding geometry was seen to influence the distribution of the foam fraction. Our simulations showed an average spatial variation of about 1.1% in the distribution of solid foam fraction from the walls to the core, as verified with data from CT scan analysis of the expanded foam. This also reflects the distribution of void fraction in the foam matrix. The models were validated with experimental data, and our results favourably compared with the experiment observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据