4.6 Article

Suitability of hepatocyte cell lines HepG2, AML12 and THLE-2 for investigation of insulin signalling and hepatokine gene expression

期刊

OPEN BIOLOGY
卷 8, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsob.180147

关键词

insulin; hepatocyte; signalling; cells

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  2. Open Access Publishing Fund of the University of Tubingen
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01GI0925]
  4. Fortune Program of the Faculty of Medicine at the University Hospital Tubingen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Immortal hepatocyte cell lines are widely used to elucidate insulin-dependent signalling pathways and regulation of hepatic metabolism, although the often tumorigenic origin might not represent the metabolic state of healthy hepatocytes. We aimed to investigate if murine cell line AML12 and human cell line THLE-2, which are derived from healthy liver cells, are comparable to hepatoma cell line HepG2 for studying acute insulin signalling and expression of gluconeogenic enzymes and hepatokines. Insulin responsiveness of AML12 and THLE-2 cells was impaired when cells were cultured in the recommended growth medium, but comparable with HepG2 cells by using insulin-deficient medium. THLE-2 cells showed low abundance of insulin receptor, while protein levels in HepG2 and AML12 were comparable. AML12 and THLE-2 cells showed only low or nondetectable transcript levels of G6PC and PCK1. Expression of ANGPTL4 was regulated similarly in HepG2 and AML12 cells upon peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta activation but only HepG2 cells resemble the in vivo regulation of hepatic ANGPTL4 by cAMP. Composition of the culture medium and protein expression levels of key signalling proteins should be considered when AML12 and THLE-2 are used to study insulin signalling. With regard to gluconeogenesis and hepatokine expression, HepG2 cells appear to be closer to the in vivo situation despite the tumorigenic origin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据