4.5 Article

Association between dementia and mortality in the elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis

期刊

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0988-6

关键词

Hip fracture; Mortality; Dementia; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. project foundation of Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital [yzucms201623, fcjs201715]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81772332]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveThis study was designed to verify the association between dementia and mortality in the elderly undergoing hip fracture surgery, and assessed the mortality of patients with dementia after hip fracture surgery.Material and methodsPubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched until April, 2018 without language restrictions. Two reviewers selected related studies, assessed study quality, and extracted data independently. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were derived using random-effects model throughout all analyses. The endpoints included 30-day, 6-month, 1-year, and more than 1-year mortality. This meta-analysis was performed following PRISMA statement and carried out by using stata14.0 software.ResultsDementia significantly increased postoperative mortality of patients suffered from hip fracture in 30-day [RR=1.57, 95% CI (1.29, 1.90), P<0.00], 6-month [RR=1.97, 95% CI (1.47, 2.63), P<0.00], 1-year [RR=1.77, 95% CI (1.54, 2.04), P<0.00], and more than 1-year follow up [RR=1.60, 95% CI (1.30, 1.96), P<0.00] respectively. The mortality of dementia patients after hip fracture surgery in 30-day [ES=12%, 95% CI (8%, 15%)], 6-month [ES=32%, 95% CI (17%, 48%)], 1-year [ES=39%, 95% CI (35%, 43%)], and more than 1-year follow up [ES=45%, 95% CI (32%, 58%)].ConclusionsOur meta-analysis demonstrated that the mortality of patients with dementia suffered from hip fracture surgery is 12%, 32%, 39%, and 45%, and dementia increased 1.57, 1.97, 1.77, and 1.60-fold mortality in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery in 30-day, 6-month, 1-year, and more than 1-year follow up respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据