4.7 Article

PEGylation Regulates Self-Assembled Small-Molecule Dye-Based Probes from Single Molecule to Nanoparticle Size for Multifunctional NIR-II Bioimaging

期刊

ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201800973

关键词

bioimaging; PEGylation; second near-infrared window; self-assembly; small-molecule dyes

资金

  1. National Key RD Program [2017YFA0505203]
  2. NSFC [21708012, 21772055]
  3. NSFHP [2017CFB151]
  4. CCNU from the colleges, basic research and operation of MOE [23020205170469]
  5. 111 project [B17019]
  6. Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science [SKLACLS1815]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To date, small-molecule dye-based probes have been at the forefront of research in biomedical imaging, especially in the second near-infrared (NIR-II) window (1.0-1.7 mu m). However, how to precisely regulate the synthesized size of NIR-II organic dye-based probes remains challenging. Moreover, systematic studies on whether the size of NIR-II probes affects optical/pharmacokinetic properties are still rare. Here, an ingenious PEGylation strategy is developed to regulate the self-assembly size of organic dye-based (CH1055 scaffold) NIR-II probes (SCH1-SCH4) from nanoparticles to the single molecule, and the relationship between their size and chemical/physical properties is thoroughly investigated. Based on their own merits, nanoprobe SCH1 (approximate to 170 nm), with outstanding fluorescent brightness (quantum yield approximate to 0.14%), performs accurate tracing of the lymphatic system as well as identification of vessel networks in mice brains with excellent signal-to-background ratio images. Meanwhile, rapidly excreted SCH4, showing fast and high passive liver tumor uptake and promising tumor/normal tissue ratios (>7), is capable of facilitating precise image-guided tumor surgery, and also demonstrates the first example of the assessment of liver fibrosis in the NIR-II window.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据