4.7 Article

Obesity Aggravates Acute Pancreatitis via Damaging Intestinal Mucosal Barrier and Changing Microbiota Composition in Rats

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36266-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81300359, U1702281, 81670551]
  2. Chinesisch-Deutsches Zentrum fur Wissenschaftsforderung [GZ1065]
  3. Science and Technology Support Program of Sichuan province [2016SZ0041]
  4. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0205400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obesity may aggravate acute pancreatitis (AP) through damaging the intestinal mucosal barrier (IMB). The underlying mechanism remains unclear. This study was aimed to provide further data to clarify the mechanism. 48 rats were divided into 4 groups: 1) normal control (NC), chow-fed rats with sham operation, 2) no-obese rats with AP (NAP), chow-fed rats with taurocholate infusion, 3) obese control (OC), high-fat diet (HFD)-fed rats with sham operation, and 4) obese rats with AP (OAP), HFD-fed rats with taurocholate infusion. Pancreatic pathologic score (11.39 +/- 1.76 vs. 14.11 +/- 1.05, p=0.005), intestinal permeability to FD4 (0.91 +/- 0.25 mu g/ml vs. 7.06 +/- 3.67 mu g/ml, p < 0.001), serum leptin (10.25 +/- 5.59 mu g/ml vs. 79.73 +/- 38.44 mu g/ml, p < 0.001) and ilea! apoptosis (2.05 +/- 0.73% vs. 4.53 +/- 2.28%, p=0.006) were significantly higher in OAP than in NAP group. The intestinal bacterial richness (Chao 1 and OTUs) was significantly lower in OAP than in NAP rats. The higher abundance of Proteobacteria and reduced proportions of intestinal Actinobacteria, Allobaculum and Barnesiella were detected in OAP group. Obesity may result in decreased intestinal leptin/ObR-b binding, distinct phylogenetic clusters of ilea! bacterial communities, increased intestinal inflammatory injury and the insufficient intestinal epithelial cells proliferation during AP attack. Pancreatic injury was aggravated due to obesity associated dysfunction of IMB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据