4.7 Article

Electrophysiological properties of human beta-cell lines EndoC-beta H1 and -beta H2 conform with human beta-cells

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34743-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Novo Nordisk
  2. University of Oxford
  3. Wellcome Trust [095531/Z11/Z, 095101, 200837, 106130]
  4. Medical Research Council [MR/L020149/1]
  5. European Union Horizon 2020 Programme (T2D Systems)
  6. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)
  7. Swedish Research Council
  8. MRC [G0801995, MR/L020149/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Limited access to human islets has prompted the development of human beta cell models. The human beta cell lines EndoC-beta H1 and EndoC-beta H2 are increasingly used by the research community. However, little is known of their electrophysiological and secretory properties. Here, we monitored parameters that constitute the glucose-triggering pathway of insulin release. Both cell lines respond to glucose (6 and 20 mM) with 2- to 3-fold stimulation of insulin secretion which correlated with an elevation of [Ca2+](i), membrane depolarisation and increased action potential firing. Similar to human primary beta cells, K-ATP channel activity is low at 1mM glucose and is further reduced upon increasing glucose concentration; an effect that was mimicked by the K-ATP channel blocker tolbutamide. The upstroke of the action potentials reflects the activation of Ca2+ channels with some small contribution of TTX-sensitive Na+ channels. The repolarisation involves activation of voltage-gated Kv2.2 channels and large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels. Exocytosis presented a similar kinetics to human primary beta cells. The ultrastructure of these cells shows insulin vesicles composed of an electrondense core surrounded by a thin clear halo. We conclude that the EndoC-beta H1 and -beta H2 cells share many features of primary human beta-cells and thus represent a useful experimental model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据