4.7 Article

Gender- and Age-Related Changes in Trunk Muscle Composition Using Chemical Shift Encoding-Based Water-Fat MRI

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu10121972

关键词

skeletal muscle; magnetic resonance imaging; muscular fat deposition; obesity; BMI

资金

  1. European Research Council [677661-ProFatMRI, 637164-iBack]
  2. German Research Foundation [DFG-SFB824/A9]
  3. Philips Healthcare
  4. Else Kroener-Fresenius-Foundation, Bad Homburg, Germany
  5. Technical University of Munich (TUM)
  6. Helmholtz cross-program topic Metabolic Dysfunction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ageing, sarcopenia, and malnutrition are associated with quantitative and qualitative changes of body composition. There are several imaging modalities, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), for the assessment of trunk muscle tissue composition. In this study, we investigated the gender- and age-related changes in trunk muscle composition using chemical shift encoding-based water-fat MRI. A total of 79 healthy volunteers (26 men: 38.9 +/- 10.4 years; 53 women: 39.5 +/- 15.0 years) underwent 3T axial MRI using a six-echo multi-echo 3D spoiled gradient echo sequence, allowing for the calculation of the proton density fat fraction (PDFF) in the trunk muscles. PDFF of the abdominal, psoas, and erector spinae muscles were determined. We detected significant positive correlations for abdominal muscle PDFF with age (r = 0.638, p = 0.0001) in men, and for abdominal muscle PDFF (r = 0.709, p = 0.0001) and erector spinae muscle PDFF (r = 0.674, p = 0.0001) with age in women. After adjustment for body mass index (BMI), only the correlation of age and abdominal muscle PDFF in women remained significant (r = 0.631, p = 0.0001). The findings of this study suggest that an increasing fat deposition in muscle is driven primarily by age, rather than BMI, in women. These results further support that PDFF can be considered a valid imaging biomarker of trunk muscle composition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据