4.7 Article

Dietary Patterns and Their Sociodemographic and Lifestyle Determinants in Switzerland: Results from the National Nutrition Survey menuCH

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu11010062

关键词

dietary survey; 24-h recall; language region; clustering; multinomial logistic regression

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (National Research Project 69: Sustainable and healthy diets: Trade-offs and synergies) [4069-166765]
  2. Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office [5.17.02ERN]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

From a public health perspective, determinants of diets are crucial to identify, but they remain unclear in Switzerland. Hence, we sought to define current dietary patterns and their sociodemographic and lifestyle determinants using the national nutrition survey menuCH (2014-2015, n = 2057). First, we applied multiple factorial analysis and hierarchical clustering on the energy-standardised daily consumption of 17 food categories. Four dietary patterns were identified (Swiss traditional: high intakes of dairy products and chocolate, n = 744; Western 1: soft drinks and meat, n = 383; Western 2: alcohol, meat and starchy, n = 444; and Prudent: n = 486). Second, we used multinomial logistic regression to examine the determinants of the four dietary patterns: ten sociodemographic or lifestyle factors (sex, age, body mass index, language region, nationality, marital status, income, physical activity, smoking status, and being on a weight-loss diet) were significantly associated with the dietary patterns. Notably, belonging to the French- and Italian-speaking regions of Switzerland increased the odds of following a Prudent diet (Odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.92 [1.45-2.53] and 1.68 [0.98-2.90], respectively) compared to the German-speaking regions. Our findings highlight the influence of sociodemographic and lifestyle parameters on diet and the particularities of the language regions of Switzerland. These results provide the basis for public health interventions targeted for population subgroups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据