4.8 Article

Contrasting responses of autumn-leaf senescence to daytime and night-time warming

期刊

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
卷 8, 期 12, 页码 1092-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-018-0346-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA19040103]
  2. International Cooperation and Exchange Programs of National Science Foundation of China [41761134082]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41522109]
  4. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [QYZDB-SSW-DQC011]
  5. European Research Council Synergy [ERC-SyG-2013-610028 IMBALANCE-P]
  6. Ned P. Smith Professorship of Climatology, University of Wisconsin-Madison

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant phenology is a sensitive indicator of climate change(1-4) and plays an important role in regulating carbon uptake by plants(5-7). Previous studies have focused on spring leaf-out by daytime temperature and the onset of snow-melt time(8,9), but the drivers controlling leaf senescence date (LSD) in autumn remain largely unknown(10-12). Using long-term ground phenological records (14,536 time series since the 1900s) and satellite greenness observations dating back to the 1980s, we show that rising pre-season maximum daytime (T-day) and minimum night-time (T-night) temperatures had contrasting effects on the timing of autumn LSD in the Northern Hemisphere (>20 degrees N). If higher T-day leads to an earlier or later LSD, an increase in T-night systematically drives LSD to occur oppositely. Contrasting impacts of daytime and night-time warming on drought stress may be the underlying mechanism. Our LSD model considering these opposite effects improved autumn phenology modelling and predicted an overall earlier autumn LSD by the end of this century compared with traditional projections. These results challenge the notion of prolonged growth under higher autumn temperatures, suggesting instead that leaf senescence in the Northern Hemisphere will begin earlier than currently expected, causing a positive climate feedback.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据