4.6 Article

Is the aging human ovary still ticking?: Expression of clock-genes in luteinized granulosa cells of young and older women

期刊

JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13048-018-0471-3

关键词

Circadian clock genes; Granulosa cells; Reproductive aging

资金

  1. Hadassah Medical Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: It has been shown - mostly in animal models - that circadian clock genes are expressed in granulosa cells and in corpora luteum and might be essential for the ovulatory process and steroidogenesis. Objective: We sought to investigate which circadian clock genes exist in human granulosa cells and whether their expression and activity decrease during aging of the ovary. Study design: Human luteinized granulosa cells were isolated from young (age 18-33) and older (age 39-45) patients who underwent in-vitro fertilization treatment. Levels of clock genes expression were measured in these cells 36 h after human chorionic gonadotropin stimulation. Methods: Human luteinized granulosa cells were isolated from follicular fluid during oocyte retrieval. The mRNA expression levels of the circadian genes CRY1, CRY2, PER1, PER2, CLOCK, ARNTL, ARNTL2, and NPAS2 were analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results: We found that the circadian genes CRY1, CRY2, PER1, PER2, CLOCK, ARNTL, ARNTL2, and NPAS2, are expressed in cultured human luteinized granulosa cells. Among these genes, there was a general trend of decreased expression in cells from older women but it reached statistical significance only for PER1 and CLOCK genes (fold change of 0.27 +/- 0.14; p = 0.03 and 0.29 +/- 0.16; p = 0.05, respectively). Conclusions: This preliminary report indicates that molecular circadian clock genes exist in human luteinized granulosa cells. There is a decreased expression of some of these genes in older women. This decline may partially explain the decreased fertility and steroidogenesis of reproductive aging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据