4.7 Article

Gastric cancer combination therapy: synthesis of a hyaluronic acid and cisplatin containing lipid prodrug coloaded with sorafenib in a nanoparticulate system to exhibit enhanced anticancer efficacy and reduced toxicity

期刊

DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 3321-3333

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S176879

关键词

nanocarriers; chemotherapy; polyethylene glycol; enhanced permeability and retention effect; reticuloendothelial system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Gastric cancer is one of the most common human epithelial malignancies, and using nanoparticles (NPs) in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer has been extensively studied. The aim of this study was to develop hyaluronic acid (HA) containing lipid NPs coloaded with cisplatin (CDDP) and sorafenib (SRF) for the treatment of gastric cancer. Materials and methods: HA and CDDP containing lipid prodrug was synthesized using polyethylene glycol (PEG) as a linker (HA-PEG-CDDP). HA-PEG-CDDP and SRF were entrapped into the lipid NPs by nanoprecipitation method (H-CS-NPs). The physicochemical and biochemical properties such as size, zeta potential, and drug release pattern were studied. In vitro viability was also evaluated with MKN28 and SGC7901 human gastric cancer cells. In vivo testing including biodistribution and accumulation in tumor tissue was applied in gastric tumor-bearing mice to confirm the inhibition of gastric cancer. Results: H-CS-NP has a particle size of 173.2 +/- 5.9 nm, with a zeta potential of -21.5 +/- 3.2 mV. At day 21 of in vivo treatment, H-CS-NPs inhibited the tumor volume from 1,532.5 +/- 41.3 mm(3) to 259.6 +/- 16.3 mm(3) with no obvious body weight loss. In contrast, mice treated with free drugs had body weight loss from 20 to 15 g at the end of study. Conclusion: The results indicate that H-CS-NPs enhanced the antitumor effect of drugs and reduced the systemic toxicity effects. It could be used as a promising nanomedicine for gastric cancer combination therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据