4.6 Article

Perception enhancement using importance-driven hybrid rendering for augmented reality based endoscopic surgical navigation

期刊

BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 5205-5226

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/BOE.9.005205

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0107900]
  2. National Science Foundation Program of China [61672099, 81627803, 61501030, 61527827]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Misleading depth perception may greatly affect the correct identification of complex structures in image-guided surgery. In this study, we propose a novel importance-driven hybrid rendering method to enhance perception for navigated endoscopic surgery. First, the volume structures are enhanced using gradient-based shading to reduce the color information in low-priority regions and improve the distinctions between complicated structures. Second, an importance sorting method based on the order-independent transparency rendering is introduced to intensify the perception of multiple surfaces. Third, volume data are adaptively truncated and emphasized with respect to the perspective orientation and the illustration of critical information for viewing range extension. Various experimental results prove that with the combination of volume and surface rendering, our method can effectively improve the depth distinction of multiple objects both in simulated and clinical scenes. Our importance-driven surface rendering method demonstrates improved average performance and statistical significance as rated by 15 participants (five clinicians and ten non-clinicians) on a five-point Likert scale. Further, the average frame rate of hybrid rendering with thin-layer sectioning reaches 42 fps. Given that the process of the hybrid rendering is fully automatic, it can be utilized in real-time surgical navigation to improve the rendering efficiency and information validity. (C) 2018 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据