4.8 Article

Robust Pitch on Silicon Nanolayer-Embedded Graphite for Suppressing Undesirable Volume Expansion

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201803121

关键词

lithium ion batteries; pitch; Si anodes; solid electrolyte interphase; volume expansion

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  2. Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea [20172410100140]
  3. Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy/Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (MOTIE/KEIT) [10067185]
  4. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10067185] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A significant volume expansion exhibited by high-capacity active materials upon lithiation has hindered their application as Li-ion battery anode materials. Although tremendous progress has been made in the development of coating methods that improve the stability of high-capacity active materials, suitable coating sources that are both strong and economical to use are yet to be discovered. Pitch is reported here as a promising coating source for high-capacity anodes owing to the high mechanical strength and low-cost process. Using in situ transmission electron microscopy, it is found that pitch can withstand the severe volume expansion that occurs upon Si lithiation owing to its high mechanical strength, originating from the long-range graphitic ordering. Notably, pitch-coated silicon nanolayer-embedded graphite (SG) exhibits superior capacity retention (81.9%) compared to that of acetylene-coated SG (66%) over 200 cycles in a full-cell by effectively mitigating volume expansion, even under industrial electrode density conditions (1.6 g cc(-1)). Thus, this work presents new possibilities for the development of high-capacity anodes for industrial implementation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据