4.8 Review

Formation of C-C and C-Heteroatom Bonds by C-H Activation by Metal Organic Frameworks as Catalysts or Supports

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 1081-1102

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b04506

关键词

heterogeneous catalysis; metal organic frameworks; cross-coupling reactions; C-H activation; C-C bond formation; C-N bond formation; C-O bond formation; C-B bond formation

资金

  1. University Grants Commission, New Delhi
  2. Department of Science and Technology, India [EMR/2016/006500]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CTQ2015-69153-CO2-1]
  4. Generalitat Valenciana [Prometeo 2017-083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cross-coupling reactions catalyzed by transition metals are currently among the most widely used transformations in organic synthesis. In most of these reactions, the coupling involves the reaction of two complementary functional groups, particularly boronates and halides. For the sake of atom economy and simplicity of the starting materials, it is more advantageous when the coupling involves C-H activation of one substrate lacking a reactive functional group. The present review focuses on the use of metal organic frameworks (MOFs) as solid reusable catalysts to promote cross-coupling reactions involving C-H activation. After general considerations, the review is organized according to the bond formed in the coupling, either C-C or C-heteroatom (N, O, B and X). The purpose of this mini review is to show the performance of MOFs as heterogeneous catalysts in these reactions, combining a high activity due to the large percentage of accessible metal sites and high stability allowing the reuse of the material in consecutive cycles. Comparison with homogeneous analogous catalysts indicates that this improved performance derives from the porosity, large surface area and site isolation and immobilization occurring in the MOFs. Considering the growing interests in these reactions the last section forecasts future developments in these areas in near future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据