4.8 Article

Molecular recognition of the native HIV-1 MPER revealed by STED microscopy of single virions

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07962-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish MINECO [BIO2015-64421-R]
  2. Basque Government [IT838-13]
  3. MRC [MC_UU_12010, G0902418, MC_UU_12025]
  4. Wellcome Trust [104924/14/Z/14, 091911]
  5. MRC/BBSRC/EPSRC [MR/K01577X/1]
  6. BBSRC (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Research unit 1905 Structure and function of the peroxisomal translocon))
  7. Wolfson Foundation
  8. EPA Cephalosporin Fund
  9. John Fell Fund
  10. Canada Graduate Scholarship Master's Award
  11. Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  12. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [NIH-150414]
  13. Canada Research Chairs program
  14. Basque Government
  15. BBSRC [BB/P026354/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  16. MRC [MC_UU_00008/9, MC_PC_15065, MR/S005382/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibodies against the Membrane-Proximal External Region (MPER) of the Env gp41 subunit neutralize HIV-1 with exceptional breadth and potency. Due to the lack of knowledge on the MPER native structure and accessibility, different and exclusive models have been proposed for the molecular mechanism of MPER recognition by broadly neutralizing antibodies. Here, accessibility of antibodies to the native Env MPER on single virions has been addressed through STED microscopy. STED imaging of fluorescently labeled Fabs reveals a common pattern of native Env recognition for HIV-1 antibodies targeting MPER or the surface subunit gp120. In the case of anti-MPER antibodies, the process evolves with extra contribution of interactions with the viral lipid membrane to binding specificity. Our data provide biophysical insights into the recognition of the potent and broadly neutralizing MPER epitope on HIV virions, and as such is of importance for the design of therapeutic interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据