4.8 Article

Direct cysteine sulfenylation drives activation of the Src kinase

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06790-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 HL085646, R01 HL138708, R01 ES021476, F32 HL129706, T32 HL076122]
  2. Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center (PSC) through NIH [R01 GM116961]
  3. Stampede from the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE, NSF) [ACI-1053575]
  4. Vermont Genetics Network through NIH [8P20 GM103449]
  5. National Center for Research Resources [NCRR 5 P30 RR 032135]
  6. National Institute of General Medical Sciences from the NIH, University of Vermont Neuroscience COBRE Grant [GMS 8 P30 GM103498]
  7. NIH from the National Center for Research Resources [1S10 RR019246]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Src kinase controls aspects of cell biology and its activity is regulated by intramolecular structural changes induced by protein interactions and tyrosine phosphorylation. Recent studies indicate that Src is additionally regulated by redox-dependent mechanisms, involving oxidative modification(s) of cysteines within the Src protein, although the nature and molecular-level impact of Src cysteine oxidation are unknown. Using a combination of biochemical and cell-based studies, we establish the critical importance of two Src cysteine residues, Cys-185 and Cys-277, as targets for H2O2-mediated sulfenylation (Cys-SOH) in redox-dependent kinase activation in response to NADPH oxidase-dependent signaling. Molecular dynamics and metadynamics simulations reveal the structural impact of sulfenylation of these cysteines, indicating that Cys-277-SOH enables solvent exposure of Tyr-416 to promote its (auto)phosphorylation, and that Cys-185-SOH destabilizes pTyr-527 binding to the SH2 domain. These redox-dependent Src activation mechanisms offer opportunities for development of Src-selective inhibitors in treatment of diseases where Src is aberrantly activated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据